Closer home, the M. P. High court has ruled (Jan 2012) that
“Gita is essentially a book on Indian philosophy, not book on Indian religion”.
This judgment gave a sanction on the decision of M.P. Government to continue
with the teaching of Gita Sar (Essence of Gita) in the MP schools. This
petition had come up in the court when the Catholic Bishop Council appealed
that moral values of all religions should be taught in schools and not just
Gita. So now the M.P. High Court has concluded that since Gita is a book on
Indian Philosophy and not on religion, it can be continued as such and the need
to consider introducing the moral values from other religions as well, need not
be considered. Incidentally other BJP ruled state; Karnataka is also planning
to introduce the teaching of Gita in its schools. While giving this judgment,
one wonders if the honorable judge forgot that while the oath is administered
to Hindus in his court, they are made to do take oath by keeping their hand on
the same Holy book, as a religious book not for its philosophy!
One is reminded of another judgment at this time, the one
known as “Hindutva as a way of life”. The Supreme Court was to decide whether
the use of the word Hindutva in elections tantamount to corrupt electoral
practices or not, as Hindutva divides people along religious lines. Contrary to
the theological, sociological and political understanding that Hinduism is a
religion and that the word Hindutva is built around Hindu religious identity,
Court ruled something which opened the floodgates of dividing people along
religious lines. This judgment ‘Hindutva is a way of life’ exonerated someone
who was doing divisive religious propaganda and gave legitimacy to the politics
in the name of religion. Now the Gita judgment has again raised the questions about
the nature of Hinduism, its religious texts and its religious belief.
Opportunistically the MP government and other Hindutva
ideologues who called Gita as a holy Hindu religious scripture, and so needs to
be taught in schools are keeping quiet, as this judgment suits their political
agenda. The confusions prevail at multiple layers, as Hinduism is not a prophet
based religion and there is no single 'revealed holy book’ this understanding
is being used by many to take the convenient path of taking the meaning which
suits their purpose.
While term Hindu is of late origin, eighth century, the
consolidation of Hinduism from the various prevailing religious sects has been
a process beginning around that time with Magadh Maurayan empire. There are
many a religious scriptures, many a holy books in this umbrella of Hinduism,
Vedas, Upanishads, Ramayana, Mahabharata etc. So which is the holy scripture of
Hindus? While all these books are regarded as Holy, over a period of time Hindu
religion is being shaped around, One Deity, (Lord Ram) One Book (Gita), One
Clergy (Acharyas, Mahants). The verdict of the court defies logic when it
proclaims, “Gita is essentially a book on Indian philosophy not book on Indian
religion.”
The Bhagwat Gita or Gita (Song of God) is a 700 verse
scripture that is part of the epic Mahabharata. As it is drawn from Mahabharata
it can be labeled as Smriti text. Some sects of Hinduism give it the
status of Upanishad, thereby making it sruti (revealed) book. It is also
regarded to represent the summary of Upanishadic teachings and so it is also
called as ‘Upanishad of Upanishads’. In this Holy Scripture Lord Krishna
teaches Arjun about his duties as a Prince belonging to Kshtriya Varna. Arjun
was faced with the dilemma of the war, the possibility of killing his own kin,
cousins and others. Lord tells Arjun that it is his holy duty to undertake the
war. Lord elaborates on different Yogas and so Gita is often described as a
core of Hindu theology. As most holy scriptures are the revelations from the
supreme God, in Gita also Krishna reveals his
identity as Supreme Being himself (Svayam Bhagvan). He blesses Arjun with the
awe inspiring vision of divine universal form.
The Gita elaborates on the central part of Hindu theology,
the origin of Varnas. In Purush Sukta of Vedas Lord Brahma narrates as to how
he created four Varnas from the body of Virat Purush. In Gita on similar lines
Lord Krishna also tells about the divine origin of Varna’s. Lord says that the fourfold order
was created by him according to the divisions of quality (Guna) and
work (karma).
One knows that origin of Hinduism is different from the Prophet based religions. Here there has been an evolution of the Hinduism over a period of time and today while Hinduism is a religion, Gita is its Holy Scripture. To take the stand that it is Indian philosophy and not religious one is far from truth. There is philosophy also in many a Holy Scriptures. Notwithstanding that, they are primarily religious scriptures. The verdict of the court needs re-examination as it is not conforming to the belief of millions of Hindus; neither can it stand the scrutiny of rational understanding about Hinduism as a religion. From the religion of Pastoral Aryans to the practices of Hindus today, there is a long journey. The communal forces want to introduce this text in schools as not only they want to impose Hindu nation in this country but also through this book, they aim to reinforce the concept of Varna, which is one of the core doctrine of Hinduism, and Gita tells this by attributing Varna to the divine creation by Lord Himself. While there are many a philosophical formulations in this divine book there is also the subtle defense of
Response only to : ram.puniyani@gmail.com