OPPOSING THE ONWARD MARCH OF CRIMINALS “ISLAMIC MADNESS”: OR
is it STEREOTYPE OR A REALITY?
Most Modern perspectives on human growth and development, human relationships
places emphasis on co-existence and harmony in dealing with human being, while,
Islam places more emphasis on the process of ritualistic behavior. As a
dualistic perspective, the single most important theme that runs the work of
the uneducated, desert dweller and slave trader Mohammad is the concept of
Dar-ul-Islam and Al-Taqia (Lying). Missing from Islam is the most important
humanistic perspective—the concept of “the real self- and its realization”.
Most Humanists believe that self-actualizing people are more efficient in
perceiving reality, more accepting of themselves and others. They are natural,
more spontaneous, more problem centered, and capable of being detached from
violence and aggressive objectives.
In addition, most of the spiritualists and religious people are autonomous,
capable of being detached, capable of a fresh appreciation of things, and open
to mystical experiences. They show good deal of interest in others, and their
development process democratic character structures. Most of these
characteristics are not mutually exclusive but overlap with each other to a
great extent. Finally, spiritualists have a sense of humor, are creative and
yet at the same time are able to resist evil forces of the culture in which
they live.
Muslims, on the other hand postulates the human needs or wants as the most
important aspect of their life. Sex, material possession, political power,
hatred, discrimination and eliminating beheading of kefirs and infidels,
Al-Taquiea, Dar-Ul-Islam are the most important elements in Islam. Sexual
needs, hunger for spreading Islam, polygamy, dress code, increasing the number
of Jihad terrorists are the most important works of Mullahs and Islamists.
Perhaps more than any other perspective, the Islamic perspective has never been
affected by the scientific, cultural changes of the world. The world is
changing. Muslims ignore the fact and insist on promoting the desert culture of
Saudi Arabia.
Muslims are not interested in promoting democracy, peace, progress,
co-existence, human rights and human relationships. Muslims around the world
are not interested in promoting the scientific enterprise, particularly
scientific psychology, meditation, consciousness rising as a legitimate field
of study. Muslims ignore the humanistic psychology, or needs for
self-actualization. Instead, Islamists promote aggressiveness, violence and are
obsessed in promoting conventional modes of dress and desert culture and
Behavior. Islam is enslaving “Democratic”,“thinking”, “Independent”
“intelligent Muslims” who form a minuscule minority of the one billion muslims
like Anwar Sheikh and Ibn Warraq.
Islamic description of humans is unproductive, arbitrary, capricious and
Islamic rigid assumptions and its aggressive methodologies are not helping
Muslims to solve common human problems.
Many peace loving people hate Islam and Jihadi terrorists. It is natural,
genuine, and reasonable for health, life and safety. If I see fire in my house,
I have to run away from the danger zone. My reaction should be directly
proportionate to the danger presented. I need not suffer from hatred of fire
permanently. But Muslims by training and learning of the unholy Koran are
perpetually afraid of Kaffirs and infidels and want to kill all Jews,
Christians, and Hindus.
What is wrong with the meaningful statement "Never tolerate a Jihadi
terrorist and Islam and your death causing disease". Islam is the root
cause of terrorism around the world.
It is natural and genuine and reasonable for any intelligent man not to
tolerate or compromise with Jihadi terrorists who advocate Muslims to behead
all Kaffirs and infidels. Unless the free world is united and gain strength and
strategies to face Islamic terrorists, there will be no more peace in the
world.
I do not feel that it is possible to make a choice between an Islamic
Terrorist with a sword with his abnormal behavior of beheading an infidel and
enjoy sex with virgin girls in front of their desert Deity Allah. Rather, I
will argue that tolerance of deviant behavior of a Muslim terrorist is not a
positive virtue.
The advocates of hatred and rigid, narrow, closed channel thinking and
murdering innocent infidels must see the events from different perspectives.
Thus, our purpose is not spreading tolerance of intolerant Muslims and rather
than to produce yet another polemic arguing for the superiority of hatred for
your assassins, terrorists and throat cutters.
There is no merit in arguing from an Islamic perspective. I believe this
is because the commitment to abnormal Islamic behavior implies or even requires
a commitment to kill all infidels and make the whole world into Dar-ul-Islam.
The Koran contains several inhuman and extraordinary statements. The Koran
asserts that Islam has no goal for self-realization but uses violence and
aggressive techniques toward which it increases the number. Islam is a primitive,
criminal dogma and is characterized by increasingly detailed understanding of
its criminal intentions. Islam moves toward its specific World Conquering as
its goal {dar-ul-islam}. What is wrong with opposing the onward march of
criminals?
The Failure of Islamic perspective to deal with the social impact of
deviant, criminal behavior of jihadi terrorists has stimulated a great deal of
recent criticism of Islam. Islamists will certainly have to be responsive to
these and still other problems created by jihadis around the world.
Until Islam adopts a humanistic perspective, and move from a desert,
closed Saudi Arabian dogma the possibility of further growth is dimmed.
Islamic Mullahs must realize that humans are not merely mechanical animals or
merely psychological or social in nature. In the field of religion, an abstract
and functional concept it must appeals to scientific, reasonable, and
intelligent perspectives on human nature. Of course, Islamists are not above
such concerns. These abstract concepts, functional concepts, strategies and
actions proposed by the religious leaders often play a powerful and tactic role
in the choice of a religion of the common man
We cannot predict with certainty which religious perspective will survive. But
we can point to some characteristics it must possess to survive and perhaps to
become the normal religion spiritually of the future.
Of Course, in most cases it is more accurate to suggest that ISLAM
occupies a range along this continuum through violence and sheer demographic
numbers. The basic concepts of Islam will reflect the abnormal, criminal,
deviant behavior of the jihadi.
ISLAM is not a religious theory. It lacks coherence as a religious
perspective. It is a patchwork for the criminals to amplify their criminal
behavior, sexual exploitation, justify looting, invasion and plunder. Islam is
essentially a mixed metaphor. Muslims and non-Muslims, real theologians,
liberals and intellectuals must attempt to encompass several level of an
analysis of Islam. This is not an easy task since one level of analysis of
Islam may not be transferable into learning in all Islamic societies.
Islamists may have difficulties in relating to other religionists, or
enter into discussions at a higher level of abstraction. The net result is
confusion, chaos and conflict. Islamists have difficulty in understanding
scientific progress, and want to dominate the world through violence and
aggression. Islamists asserts that science and scientific notions, democratic
principles and pluralism have no specific goals.
I would like to argue that modern world driven by technology is moving towards
harmony, co-existence, human rights, peace and progress. The basic conceptual
commitments are not over questions of nature of physical reality. Instead the
fundamental controversy is the nature of human beings. The period of science,
technology, reformation, industrial revolution, peace and progress is not
characterized by a single dominant view but is one in which all Jewish, Hindu,
Buddhist and Christian perspective have been dominant if not always
comfortable companions in pursuit of peace, progress and human rights.
Islam is still dominant with a single perspective, often suppress novel
observations because such critical, scientific thinking and observations may
subvert the basic conceptual commitments of Islamists. Muslims around the world
think that “everything is in the Koran and burn all libraries in the world”.
Islamists are ready and willing to defend this faulty position at considerable
cost including homicide bombing, violence, aggression, al-taquiea, and
terrorism. Muslims around the world cannot solve human problems with these
erroneous and dangerous perspective, hatred, violence, and hostility towards
infidels.
The conflict with Islamists is not simple and has a number of dimensions. The
advocates of Islam have difficulty communicating with each other, Communication
difficulties exist among advocates of different sects of Islam. Islamic Mullahs
believe and practice coercion on Kaffirs, Infidels and other followers of
Mohammad. To coerce a man is to deprive him of freedom. Slam believes only in
Allah and in individual liberty, Islam forbids democracy, political liberty and
presents others from doing what could otherwise do. , or, may be enslaved.
Muslims lack political liberty or prevented from attaining a goal of infidels.
Individual liberty is so sacred to infidels. Unless humans are left to live as
they wish in the path which concerns them, civilization cannot advance. In
Islamic societies truth will not come to light. There is no scope for
creativity, spontaneity, originality or mental energy.
Islam has no survival value like Marxism, Nazism and Fascism are
Unacceptable rigid, closed dogmas fit only for creating conflict and tension.
Criminal behavior of Islamic terrorists is presented as the possibility of
growth of Islam. Islam is not capable of moving from its primitive metaphorical
to formalized religion which can attract creative and intelligent infidels.
Islam with its dogmatic, rigid, closed theology has been used to set limits to
free inquiry. Islam encourages inhuman treatment against non-believers.
Historically, Islamic fundamentalists supported slavery, sexual oppression,
genital mutilation, limb amputation, beheading, stoning alive, polygamy,
looting, kidnapping, raping and political domination promoting human suffering.
Islam is not meant for men’s mind. Until Islamists are ready and willing for
reformation or renaissance, Islam is doomed.
Islam is not a religion of PEACE as claimed by Islamists. Muslims shout five
times at their hate preaching Mosques that “ALLAH is merciful”. Nevertheless
wherever Muslims are living, there is conflict, violence and terrorism.
Recently a great deal more has been written in criticism of Islam and terroristic
behavior of Muslims than has been written in support of it. Current dynamic
formulations and terroristic behavior are necessarily based on the pathological
verses of the Koran.
I have found it particularly striking in discussions of different perspectives
to understanding Islamic terrorist behavior. First, these discussions often
lead me to believe that we cannot ignore more than a billion Islamists in the
world. We have to make these Islamic terrorists act like humans. This is a
volatile issue on which even theologists, psychologists, human right activists
and even humanists hold strong opinions.
It is absolutely required that Muslims, and infidels should work together to
have a reformation on Islam. At least, Muslims and the Islamic elite should
modify or remove the following pathological verses from the Koran:
47:1, 47:12,7;166, 8:37, 13:17, 5:60,2:65,5:60, 74:50, 8:55, 2:27,
7:32,19:73-74,95:5, 86:6, 22:38,2:121,3:85,2:10, 5:52, 24:50, 11:29, 4:37,
70:21, 2:217, 47:1,47:8,22:18, 17:18, 48:6, 2:88, 47:10, 45:54, 32:14, 22:38,
9:32. Both emotional commitment and Islamic intransigence, and fundamental
assumptions of Islamic Mullahs are hallmarks of Islam and even just refusal to
eliminate the hostile verses from the Koran may lead to “Paradigm clash> or
“cultural Clash”
Clashes with rigid, closed Islam is inevitable when the prevailing view
of jihad terrorism is challenged by one or more new conceptual schemes. At this
point we can only guess which, Islam as a closed dogma will survive the conflict
and dominate in the future. I only hope that I have been able to communicate
some of the possibilities of the conflict and the reasons to Islamic criminals.